![]() |
|
Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > Would you trade a 2012 Freelander2 for a new Evoque? |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
OLOSTEVE Member Since: 18 Dec 2016 Location: Swanton Abbott, Norfolk NR10 5DU Posts: 351 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Have you sat in one?
|
||
![]() |
|
Dartman the one Member Since: 04 Apr 2013 Location: Seville, Spain Posts: 1706 ![]() ![]() |
Not yet, I need to save another 6 grand which will be October, due to age I need a high driving position, the Focus seat is too low, it's that or a Peugeot 3008 hybrid. My present car a Mazda CX9 is longer than a a FFRR and is a pain to park and manoeuvre round the tight village streets and it also doesn't have power door mirrors which I didn't think would be a problem but is when they need folding in a narrow street with cars parked on the offside. my PC is slightly to the right of Genghis
|
||
![]() |
|
Jagracer Member Since: 22 Feb 2019 Location: east anglia Posts: 230 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
New Evoques seem to be good at residuals, but, Engine reliability with the Inginium Engine is not so good, its a flawed Peugeot design, copied into virtually all today's manufacturers vehicles. Looking at reliability, then, what ever one buys, eighty thousand miles is the cut off. In the sixties, seventy thousand miles was British Leyland's design life, and Gold Seal engines were off the shelf at for years old. Secondhand prices reflected this, and I rarely paid more than one hundred pounds for a car in those days, as doing them up was my second income. Very thin oil is, in my opinion a Laboratory only, test medium. Perkins Engines used to specify a vert specific, made for them oil, which meant in their smaller Diesel engines, a quarter of a million mile life minimum. All Euro six engines appear to fail due to excess heat as they run very weak mixtures. Changing oil at six thousand mile intervals will give less wear. Landrover in the USA have a terrible record of bad customer service, mainly, one suspects, because JLR treat them badly, often not honoring warranties. USA web commentators like Hoovy, The Wizard, Sam Crac, Dave's Auto Shop, all have the same theme. I could comment on more, but sometimes keeping what one knows can be one's answer. I have a twenty three year old Disco 2 TD5 that needs a rear chassis repair now, but in fourteen years it has only needed servicing and tyres, etc. Most of my time with it was towing a 3.5 ton trailer load, which no FL2 can do, nor Evoque, or Disco 3. Your choice, I hope I have assisted your choice in some small way. |
||
![]() |
|
IanMetro Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Somerset BS21 Posts: 3361 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I remember 1960's cars and engines being good for about 60K miles at which point oil consumption and rust saw them on the road to the scrap heap.
|
||
![]() |
|
OxonPete Member Since: 11 Jun 2024 Location: 11350 France Posts: 175 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As I wrote on a post this week I looked at a mint condition 2017 Evoque three years ago….put off by thé much smaller windows & low driving position……sitting in the car rather than on it……as IanMetro wrote like being in à letterbox………I then researched thé Ingenium problems……& gave the car a miss…. But Awesomesauce had driven thé car & liked it so it must suit him……….& possibly the petrol engine would be ok reliability wise…………he may choose to find out…. @Jagracer……I didn’t think thé Ingenium engine range had anything to do with Peugeot…….obviously thé TD4 /SD4 & V engines were Peugeot/Ford but I thought Ingenium range was JLR…… I was thinking when I replaced the cambelt etc on my SD4 ( no sign of wear at 150k) thé modern low revving / high torque diesels have no need for OHC configuration……..I hardly ever exceed 3,000 revs….& à gear driven camshaft operating hydraulic tappers for the 4 valves / cyl would have been much more durable…….old fashioned maybe……… If not OHV then a decent duplex chain drive à la TD5….marvellous engine….I had one of the first….ran to 470k miles……did head gasket at 180k…wanted to keep it but wife objected to occasional shower from sunroof………….& chassis was rotten at rear by 2014 …couldn’t sell at decent price …too many miles ….ended up giving away………but FL2 has been better. FL2 SD4 HSE Lux Auto MY 2012— current D2 TD5 HSE Man MY 1999 470kmls….gone 2014 ….lovely engine..chassis rotten D1 300TDI Man MY 1996 56kmls….gone 1999…D2 much better Wife’s FL1 1.8P MY 2001 32kmls …gone 2007…has Mini since. |
||
![]() |
|
Bobupndown Member Since: 26 Dec 2014 Location: Upside down behind the TV! Posts: 2937 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I often think that I should have kept the Discovery 2 and put it on a galvanised chassis. But then I have had 7 1/2 happy years in my Freelander since. 👍 Landrover - turning owners into mechanics since 1948
|
||
![]() |
|
Rommel Member Since: 20 Aug 2017 Location: Sandhurst Berkshire Posts: 792 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The old boiler is still running her 1996 300TDi Defender to tow The Horse around with. Recently I put a new clutch, starter motor, lift pump, and new shocks all round. All those were the original parts that it left the factory with wonder if the replacements will last as long??? 2013 FL2 XS.
|
||
![]() |
|
OxonPete Member Since: 11 Jun 2024 Location: 11350 France Posts: 175 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had same thought Bob…..if I remember correctly Richards started doing the galvanized chassis in about 2013/14…..for about £2200……since mechanically thé Disco was ….not new but certainly near new condition despite the miles…..but I preferred driving the FL2 especially long distance….80mph in the D2 was 3000 revs/min…..just starting to sound strained….but 80 mph in FL2 = 2000rpm….a fast tick-over !
|
||
![]() |
|
IanMetro Member Since: 11 Sep 2017 Location: Somerset BS21 Posts: 3361 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
High Driving Position, Big Windows, Looks like a Land Rover, what's not to like --- well perhaps it lacks a little torque for a Big SUV, although the PHEV has a larger (90bhp) rear electric motor and may just make the FL2 SD4's performance. I'm always worried how much real grunt these hybrids have once the Drive Battery is depleted. FL2 XS SD4 Auto 2010 2012-2017 (21k - 91k miles) (MY2011) FL2 Metropolis SD4 Auto 2014 2017- (16k - 82k+ miles) (MY2015) Metro in its 11th Year of (Extended) LR Warranty / Full LR Service History (Expensive, but Trouble/Worry free - hopefully?) |
||||
![]() |
|
superspeed3065 Member Since: 15 Jul 2020 Location: lanarkshire Posts: 72 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Petrol engine Evoque, E-Pace after late 19 early 20 are have mods done and engine is supposed to be better. Strange that we hear of all maladies but other manufactures make a good job of keeping the problems quiet. eg some Audi models have had engines give in. Masses of Porche suv's have been problematic. Our Freelander is now 12 years old with 92,000 on the clock and is brilliant. The wife prefers it because of the high seating but prefers our petrol E-Pace for being such a great drivers car and the fact the sat nav screen can be on its large centre screen and also on the screen in front of the steering wheel is a great plus for us old folk when dropped into a busy city at rush hour. The Freelander sat nav does seem to update itself mostly and also doesn't have the nonsense stop start of the jag. Jag is 20 reg and we get it serviced every year and not the other nonsense of a two year service interval. Plus it has oil in thin as dishwater so maybe that won't help longevity but ours hasn't had one little glitch at all , absolutely nothing wrong!! So my advice- keep the Freelander and buy yourself an Evoque, best of both worlds!!
|
||||
![]() |
|
awesomesauce Member Since: 06 Oct 2018 Location: USA Posts: 8 ![]() |
Well, I decided to do just that ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
jules Member Since: 13 Dec 2007 Location: The Wilds of Warwickshire Posts: 5388 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Best of luck.
|
||
![]() |
|
RogB Member Since: 16 Dec 2014 Location: Mansfield Posts: 3883 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I saw a new Dacia Bigster the other day, got to say looked very very nice and probably a bit bigger than a FL2. The new Duster looks equally as good IMO |
||
![]() |
|
Bobupndown Member Since: 26 Dec 2014 Location: Upside down behind the TV! Posts: 2937 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do like the look of the Bigster but there is no decent (by which I mean big and diesel) engine option. It wouldn't have the towing ability i need. A 2.0 Tdi would make that a great car but sadly diesel is seen to be the devil's brew these days and disappearing fast in new cars. Landrover - turning owners into mechanics since 1948
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
