|
|
Forum-Gallery-Shop-Sponsors
|
| Home · FAQ · New Posts · Private Messages · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > FL2 v Audi |
|
|
|
| Cypress Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: Aldershot Posts: 137
|
Hmm,
|
||
|
| Gambba Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Location: Dubai Posts: 738
|
That GLK is certainly not my cup of tea.........in the compact 4x4 the FL2 is by far the best and most rugged looking of the lot....IMHO!
|
||
|
| gorjant Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Location: Macedonia Posts: 64
|
I think the GLK ineterior looks much classier than FL2. Just look at the display in the speedo and compare it with the cheaply looking display of the FL2:
|
||
|
| Gambba Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Location: Dubai Posts: 738
|
I'll give you that the arrangement looks better, and I would guess the nav screen has more than just navigation through it....however I am sure it is absolutely useless offroad. |
||
|
| phil_wkl Joined: 01 Mar 2008 Location: Hampshire Posts: 160
|
That binnacle design is MB standard which is nice. There's always parts of design which everyone will have an opinion on and cannot possibly satisfy everyone. At least I haven't bought an Aston Martin and discoverd my interior came from the Ford parts bin |
||
|
| gorjant Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Location: Macedonia Posts: 64
|
|
||
|
| gorjant Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Location: Macedonia Posts: 64
|
|
||
|
| yamaha-fan Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Location: Munich Posts: 250
|
Hi George, did you see the new GLK in real, or are you judging from fotos? On photos the GLK looks quite unimpressive, but the moment you face it in real you will change your mind. Mercedes seem to have put a lot of thought into this car, and I bet that this SUV will surpass all sales figures of its competitors, even though the price is high. We will talk in 12 months and see.
|
||
|
| yamaha-fan Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Location: Munich Posts: 250
|
Hi gorjant, as I work a lot for the international car industry im my capacity as lawyer, I very often have the chance to test drive new cars much prior to its official release. I try not to be biased towards any specific manufacturer - even though I do have my favourits - and the Freely 2 has impressed me at the point of test drive. The Mercedes GLK -and this is my personal opinion- has in many aspects "copied" the Freely 2, as ride quality, suspension, low noise, seating position and off road capability is very similar to the Freely 2, but the GLK feels more refined in general. The up-dated 220 cdi engine with 170 hp and 400nm torque is a delight and is considerably more responsive than the TD4. The 7-speed automatic seems to be made especially for this engine, and Mercedes is congratulated to offer the GLK only with automatic transmision. Fuel consumption and emmission-values are up-to-date, and the GLK is rated EURO 5 with regard to emission values.
|
||
|
| chicken george Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Location: Sistine chapel Posts: 2434
|
|
||
|
| lrlr2 Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Location: Kaiserslauthern Posts: 100
|
great thoughts - keep it up. I just noticed the GLK yesterday - caught my eye, but I rented MB compact in Germany last year and was not impressed.
|
||
|
| Tim in Scotland Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Location: All at sea Posts: 674
|
Well those pics are the first I've seen of the GLK........................................ looks like a rebadged Shogun/Pajero with a better quality interior. Not for me.
|
||
|
| Gambba Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Location: Dubai Posts: 738
|
CG, I have a completely different view to you on the E-class mercs (as well as C-Class) versions in terms of driving.
|
||
|
| phil_wkl Joined: 01 Mar 2008 Location: Hampshire Posts: 160
|
here's the back of a GLK...sorry I was using my phone camera |
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|







