Forum-Gallery-Shop-Sponsors

« Advertise on Freel2.com

Home > Photos, Videos & Media > Another itch to scratch
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
npinks



Member Since: 28 Jun 2007
Location: Ls25
Posts: 20090

United Kingdom 
Another itch to scratch

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO

worthy of an investment or not

Longest lens i have at the moment is 55-200 nikon as i sold the 70-300 with my old camera

I can pick on of these up for £579 new from SLRHUT

Its not going to be a portrait lens, but thinking it might be use fully whilst out and about (near my car due to the size and weight), for taking shots of the dog running about, or whilst on the speedboat of the persobn ski-ing or wake/kneeboarding

it will fit in my new bag too, with room to spare Laughing Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis

Post #233080 29th Aug 2014 2:10 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
gingerlord



Member Since: 21 Dec 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 222

United Kingdom 2012 Freelander 2 TD4 GS Manual Indus Silver

I looked at this before and decided its not worth it, my other half does professional photography and a lot of gundog work (for the Kennel Club tests regularly) and we take these items when we are both there to do it:

1x D300 w/ 70-200 VR f2.8 (Main lens for #1)
1x D300 w/ 55-200 VR f5.6 (Main lens for #2)
1x D200 w/ 50m f1.4
1x D40 w/ 18-55 kit

Never needed anything longer except for when we were shooting the HPR tests up on the moors, we just got a bit closer.

Edit: Its not a bad lense at the end of the day but unless your dog is miles away you won't be using the full extent of it and it will be starting to get "slow". Fast moving cocker + distance = recipe for sadness.

Post #233083 29th Aug 2014 2:49 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
npinks



Member Since: 28 Jun 2007
Location: Ls25
Posts: 20090

United Kingdom 

sort of thinking the same thing, I want something with a little more reach though Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis

Post #233086 29th Aug 2014 3:07 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Iliacus



Member Since: 24 Jan 2014
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 256

England 2013 Freelander 2 SD4 XS Auto Orkney Grey
Re: Another itch to scratch

npinks wrote:
Its not going to be a portrait lens, but thinking it might be use fully whilst out and about (near my car due to the size and weight), for taking shots of the dog running about, or whilst on the speedboat of the persobn ski-ing or wake/kneeboarding


500mm for shots of a moving subject or from a moving platform? I hope your dog runs in a straight line. GONE - '07 TD4 GS manual Zermatt Silver
LONG GONE - '55 Norton Dominator 99 SS cafe racer

Post #233088 29th Aug 2014 3:17 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
gingerlord



Member Since: 21 Dec 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 222

United Kingdom 2012 Freelander 2 TD4 GS Manual Indus Silver

Get a bit closer Wink

I'm tempted to cash my 18-55 and 55-200 and get the 18-200 and a 2x converter.

Post #233090 29th Aug 2014 3:19 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
snappa



Member Since: 16 Apr 2008
Location: Watching C-beams near the Tanhauser Gate
Posts: 1633

Scotland 2013 Freelander 2 TD4 GS Manual Buckingham Blue

I've had a couple of sigma lenses and found the sharpness a bit unpredictable.
Sometimes pics would look ok, some not. Admittidly they were wide zooms but still, my two cents...

Post #233097 29th Aug 2014 3:40 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
realspeed



Member Since: 26 Mar 2011
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 574

United Kingdom 

Not keen on Sigma either although I do have a fantastic 70-200mm F2.8 one. The older version of the nikon 80-400mm comes in at around £939 or the AF-s version for around £1900 on camerapricebuster. The Sigma you are looking at means you may well have a few light problems at f5.6-f6.3 and work with a high ISO most of the time. Also check out on youtube focus speed I don't think it is the fastest on the planet.
Having said that for the price it might be an option worth looking at Ex 2010 Freelander2 GS-e Diesel manual Silver owner

Post #233099 29th Aug 2014 3:55 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
snappa



Member Since: 16 Apr 2008
Location: Watching C-beams near the Tanhauser Gate
Posts: 1633

Scotland 2013 Freelander 2 TD4 GS Manual Buckingham Blue

I never understand people buying a decent camera then trying to save dosh on lenses. You can have the finest camera in the world but if you put a cheap lens on it the pics will look crap.
I always advise starting with the absolute best lens you can afford, the camera is not so important.
That said it depends how perfect you need the results to be.....

Post #233164 30th Aug 2014 8:20 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
taztastic



Member Since: 03 Feb 2011
Location: North West
Posts: 8652

England 

I agree with Snappa, I went lenses first then body, now gone to full frame and wide angle shots are immense, however, my 70-200 doesn't seem to reach anything Laughing

The Sigma at 500, will be giving you around the reach of a 750 lens in comparison and you will need fast shutter speeds and a rock steady tripod to catch anything that moves.

As others have said, get closer.

Post #233165 30th Aug 2014 8:32 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
npinks



Member Since: 28 Jun 2007
Location: Ls25
Posts: 20090

United Kingdom 

My sigma 24-70 f2.8 is a really nice lens

Though I need to get it repairs as there is a little sideward movement, I think it might have been knocked by previous owner, so that's £100 fix Evil or Very Mad

Still pondering but think the 50-500 might have better usability Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis

Post #233170 30th Aug 2014 9:37 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
snappa



Member Since: 16 Apr 2008
Location: Watching C-beams near the Tanhauser Gate
Posts: 1633

Scotland 2013 Freelander 2 TD4 GS Manual Buckingham Blue

I had a Sigma 24-70 2.8 and it was not that great.

I have heard others saying their sigma lenses are ok so maybe its the QC thats not as good as some of the major manufacturers.

I would say go in the shop with a laptop and try the lens out on your camera inside the shop, outside, shoot as much as you can in 10 mins with varying apertures and focal lengths then have a look at the shots in the shop on your laptop. If the shots look good then buy the lens!

Post #233176 30th Aug 2014 10:51 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
parallax33



Member Since: 29 Jul 2011
Location: Chandlers Ford
Posts: 316

United Kingdom 2012 Freelander 2 SD4 GS Auto Baltic Blue

Would it be best to save the money and go for another fixed aperture zoom Nick? Would help with zooming whilst holding focus... 2012 DISCOVERY 4 GS AUTO ORKNEY GREY
2012 FREELANDER 2 SD4 GS AUTO BALTIC BLUE - GONE
2011 FREELANDER 2 TD4 GS MANUAL BALI BLUE - GONE

Post #233178 30th Aug 2014 11:34 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MartinP



Member Since: 14 Feb 2014
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 95

United Kingdom 2013 Freelander 2 SD4 GS Auto Santorini Black

Sigma have a poor reputation for quality control. They seem to be turning it around with their most recent Art lenses which are cracking bits of kit. Haven't heard if it's rippling through to their older products, so I'd want to be buying from someone who would swap it no questions asked if I thought I'd been sent a dodgy example.

Do you really need the reach of a 500mm?
If you could stretch the budget I'd go for a 70-200mm f/2.8 and a 2x teleconverter. Then when you don't need the long focal length you get the advantage of the big aperture Very Happy

Post #233183 30th Aug 2014 12:24 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
npinks



Member Since: 28 Jun 2007
Location: Ls25
Posts: 20090

United Kingdom 

I have this lens that I bought a while ago

Nikon 55-200mm f4/5.6 G ED VR got it brand new for £90 something quid

It's entry level, plastic, but was wondering if extension tubes might be a way forward

If so, which one Question would I still have AF-S or lose things with tubes,

Don't know much about them Sad Former Mod/Member, with the most post & Chicken George Arch nemesis

Post #233201 30th Aug 2014 5:27 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
taztastic



Member Since: 03 Feb 2011
Location: North West
Posts: 8652

England 

Extension tubes will give you close up capabilities, Extenders give you extra reach, which is what you're after.
Sorry, don't know if you will keep the autofocus, quite possibly but extenders (decent) are not cheap.

Post #233202 30th Aug 2014 5:41 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
Freel2.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site